Wednesday, 3 July 2013

Throwback Review My Top 10 Favourites


So all my readers can get to know me better, I thought I would do a short piece on my 10 favourite movies of all time. These aren’t necessarily the movies I consider the best of all time (you will see why when I explain a couple) but the ones I enjoy watching the most. They are the movies I go to when I don’t feel like watching anything new and just feel like zoning out for a couple of hours. I will start with number 10 and work my way up to number one, providing a short description on each.

Tied 10. Star Trek II Wrath of Khan


Aside from maybe The Godfather, the Wrath of Khan is the most technically sound movie ever made. Even though I am a dedicated trekky, I am the first to admit that the original series Star Trek is often clunky and seems disjointed. However, this is the exact opposite for Wrath of Khan, it runs smooth and is as near as a perfect movie as you can get. It is perfectly paced, it contains extremely solid themes including creating life from nothing and cold-hearted revenge, and it has an ending that will leave you reaching for the Kleenexes.
Above all this, it is the villain that makes this movie. For those who don’t know, Khan Noonien Singh is a genetically engineered superhuman who was outcast to the planet Seti Alpha V in the original series episode “Space Seed”. Khan then returns in this movie to seek revenge on Captain Kirk. The back story behind Khan’s lust for revenge is fairly standard, but it is the way he goes about it is what makes him special. There were numerous occasions where he could maintain dominance over the universe, but he was so infatuated with immediately finishing off Kirk, it ultimately led to his demise. He has also given us many lines that I quote on a regular basis, including revenge is a dish best served cold and of course KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN!!!!! Even if you aren’t a Star Trek fan, I strongly encourage you to watch this film.    


Tied 10. Ghostbusters
 
Everyone has one of those nostalgic movies that summarises your childhood movie experience. For me, Ghostbusters is that movie. I watched other movies such as the Labyrinth and The Never Ending Story many times when I was younger. However if I was ever stuck in the situation where I was at the video shop needing to hire a movie to complete a combo deal, I would always go to Ghostbusters to fill this need. I’m not sure what it was, maybe it was my love for the paranormal, but I enjoyed this film more each time I watched it. I still love watching it today because it is still extremely funny and always makes me happy. 

 
9. Jurassic Park
 
What makes Jurassic Park so special is the special effects. When the film was released, the special effects set the benchmark for other films. However, what makes this film so good is that, 20 years later, these special effects would not look out of place in a movie released today. Several movies, such as Tron, have special effects that whilst dazzled when first release, have quickly become outdated. Jurassic Park is one of the few special effects based movies, along with Blade Runner and Independence Day, that have stood the test of time. It is the original, and still the best, summer blockbuster
Getting past the special effects, the genius of Stephen Spielberg really shines through in Jurassic Park. Yes Schindler’s List, Raiders of the Lost Ark and Jaws are all better films, but it takes the magic of Spielberg to make Jurassic Park a truly good film. He turns (with the help of Michael Crichton) what would be a simple, implausible plot into something that is highly complex and very plausible. Hands up who doesn’t think it would be plausible to create a similar theme park. Now hands up who thinks it is a good idea. 


8. Monty Python and the Holy Grail
I was thinking the other day that it would be unbelievably cool to be able to forget that I have ever watched the Holy Grail. I would then sit down to what I expect to be a solid comedy. I would then pay anything to see my reaction to when seemingly King Arthur would come bounding over the hill on horse only to see him pretending to ride a horse with someone banging two coconuts together.  Coming to think of it, the first four scenes of this film are unbelievably stupid, but in true Monty Python style, the comedic value is unmatched. From the unnecessary in-depth discussion about the flight capabilities of swallows to the brave knight’s inability to recognise the extent of his injuries, I am on the ground in hysterics each time I watch this film. Holy Grail is so unbelievably stupid but it works on so many levels and has entrenched itself as a comedy classic.  

7. Troll 2
This movie has made it onto the list for all the wrong reasons. There is only one way to describe Troll 2, bad. But that is the whole point of this movie. It is the quintessential “so bad it’s good film.” Its status as a bad film is exemplified through the description of the plot. In an attempt to build on the “popularity” of Troll (on a side note, Troll was one of the main influences in the creation of Harry Potter, as the main character is an aspiring wizard named, you guessed it, Harry Potter) the studio decided to create Troll 2. This was their first mistake as Troll 2 coincidentally has nothing to do with Trolls. The story centres around a group of goblins who inhabit the town of Nilbog, which is revealed to be Goblin spelled backwards in a very un-suspenseful suspenseful moment. The goblins are hell bent on capturing and eating anyone who enters their town. However, there is a twist, the goblins are in fact vegetarians. A plotline conceived due to the writer’s wife becoming increasingly annoyed that her friends where becoming vegetarians as it was considered to be socially hip. In order to eat the tourists, the goblins developed something that can turn people into plants. Is that not the most ridiculous plotline for a movie you have heard?
It is not just the plot that makes this movie terrible however, viewing the movie reveals the whole package. The plot has more holes in it than a block of Swiss cheese, characters are introduced and completely forgotten about, and the dialogue is camp at best. The poor dialogue was a result of the film being written by an Italian with a limited knowledge of the English language. This problem was enhanced due to him insisting on using an entirely Italian crew (even though the film was made in the US) who spoke no English. The stubbornness of the director to change the dialogue to flow better often frustrated the cast. From the point where the young boy freezes time and urinates on everyone’s food to stop them from turning into plants to the now infamous popcorn scene when one of the “forgotten” characters is seduced by a witch, this movie is just plain ridiculous. The former scene teaches us one thing, you can’t piss on hospitality. All I can say is grab a bowl of popcorn, put your feet up and gear yourself up for one of the most entertaining 90 minutes of cinema you will ever see.
If you are still unconvinced, go to youtube and search for Troll 2 eating scene and you will be on the floor in hysterics over one of the worst line deliveries in movie history.


6. Paranormal Activity
 
There are many people who don’t like these movies, claiming that they are too boring because nothing happens. However, this is the entire point of this movie series, in particular the first instalment. It is what doesn’t happen that is truly scary. It builds up to several moments that you expect to send you running for mummy but in the end nothing happens. These decoy frights then lead to the one final scare that comes as complete surprise, making you wish you wore brown pants today.  To truly enjoy Paranormal Activity you can’t simply sit down and start watching, you must fully immerse yourself in the movie, riding each bump like you are there and engage yourself with the characters.
Currently there are four instalments in this franchise (a number that will increase due to the low budget, high return each movie has created), all of which I have thoroughly enjoyed. However, it is the first film I enjoyed the most. Paranormal Activity almost single handily ignited the “found footage” genre. Two films tried this before, Cannibal Holocaust and The Blair Witch Project, but it really took Paranormal Activity to show studios that you could make a huge profit margin on this type of film (Paranormal Activity cost $15000 to make and took $193 million at the box office). Many films have tried to emulate the success of PA, possibly tarnishing the reputation of the original, but few have been able to capture the magic. This is one you must get on blu-ray, sit down in the middle of the night, be alone, turn off all the lights and prepare to have the wits scared out of you.


5. Predator
Alright now let’s imagine that Predator is a slasher film. In some sense it is but it is essentially more of an action/sci-fi, in the same sense as Alien is classified. In most slasher films, the cast is usually quite vulnerable and can be killed off by any two-bit with relative ease. In Predator, these guys are the best we have to offer! They are a bunch of highly skilled, experienced, trained and ripped soldiers led by none other than Arnold Swarzenegger. This makes you think, if these guys can’t kill this Alien, who will? 
                As a result of the cast, Predator can be considered as the manliest movie ever made. This exemplified by the manliest handshake ever between Arnie and Carl Weathers. Not only is there the handshake, but there is a plethora of action as well as the high powered game of cat and mouse between the commandos and the predator. All in all a great movie if you want to switch off for a couple of hours and enjoy some bonafied action.


4. A Nightmare on Elm Street
 
A Nightmare on Elm Street came in right in the thick of the slasher craze of the early eighties, in fact there had already been four Friday the 13th films and three Halloween instalments. What most of these slasher films have in common is a faceless killer mowing down popular, attractive teenagers because they did something innocuous to piss him off. What A Nightmare on Elm Street did was add a bit of substance, style and intelligence to the genre, but more importantly it gave the villain a voice. There are many defining moments that make this film stand head and shoulders above the rest in the overcrowded 80’s slasher film bonanza. Nancy Thompson (Heather Langenkamp) is more than the dumb blonde, she is the final girl who uses her brains and wit to destroy the villain. There are also some clever cinematography, including the grey streak in Nancy’s hair become more prominent as the movie goes on and the iconic image shown above. However, it is the villain, Freddy Kruger, who really steals the show. Really, for the first time, the killer is intelligent, actually speaks, and has a fairly elaborate, plausible back story. It is the mixture of his sadistic pleasure and dry wit that makes Freddy Kruger one of the best villains in movie history.
What makes A Nightmare on Elm Street so scary is that it focuses on an area where we thought we were safe and in full control, our dreams. Kruger’s ability to manipulate our dreams to suit his desires shows us we are not in control of our dreams as we once thought. This makes A Nightmare on Elm Street one of the scariest movies ever made and my favourite horror film.


3. Superbad
If you where to take my life during university and put it on the screen, Superbad would be this movie. The other members of our university social circle would agree with me. I can’t really say well this guy is exactly like Seth, or this guy is exactly like McLovin but the characters are a combination of us and we are a combination of the characters. From our sense of humour, to us getting into to ridiculous situations on the same scale as seen in the film, down to the finer details of us all being in the 8% of kids who have the necessity to draw penises (you mean like a man dick) wherever we saw fit, Superbad is me. If there is ever an occasion where I have had a tough day and needed an instant pick up, I would throw Superbad on and I would immediately feel better. As a result, Superbad is the film I would have watched the most.
Getting past the autobiographical style sense of satisfaction, Superbad is actually a great movie. It really gets away from the stereotypes that are far too overused in high school movies. Superbad focuses on your run of the mill type kids. They are not the rich kid jocks that horror movies tend to focus on and even though they can be considered nerds, they are not the ones you would see in movies such as Revenge of the Nerds. Seth, Evan and McLovin are the unpopular kids everyone loves. Not only does Superbad have original characters, but it does something that is rarely done well, two intertwining stories that meet and expand throughout the movie. These of course are the stories of Seth and Evan and their pursuit of their respective ladies and Mclovin and his escapades with the two cops. All in all Superbad is a very original movie full of quotable one-liners. It still makes me laugh each time I watch it.

2. Kill Bill Vol. 1
                Ah Uma Thurman, you are a goddess. Do I really need to explain why I like this film? It is Uma running around for 2 hours hacking people with a katana dressed in a tight yellow body suit. Do I need to say any more?


1. Pulp Fiction 
The second Tarantino film on this list but it stands head and shoulders above the rest. I know it is pretty cliché to say Pulp Fiction is my favourite movie. If you conducted a survey on everyone’s favourite movie, I would say the two most popular answers would be The Shawshank Redemption and Pulp Fiction. There is a reason for that, it is because Pulp Fiction is so cool. If you took the definition for cool and put it into movie form, you would have Pulp Fiction. From the non-linear story line to the interchanging stories that all come together in the end, this is just a fantastic film. Quentin Tarantino, I tip my hat to you. This is a unique film that is different to everything that came before it and will never be replicated.

Monday, 1 July 2013

Man of Steel

Man of Steel (2013)

Predicted Rating: 4.5 Stars

Directed by: Zack Snyder (Watchmen, 300). Starring: Henry Cavill (Blood Creek), Kevin Costner (Dances with Wolves), and Russell Crowe (Gladiator).

After discovering the imminent destruction of their planet Krypton, scientist Jor-El (Crowe) and his wife Lara send their new born baby, Kal-El, to Earth in order to save the Kryptonian race. Kal-El assumes the identity of Clark Kent (Cavill) on Earth and on a work trip to the arctic, he discovers his true identity. However, journalist Lois Lane (Amy Adams) also finds out the truth. When the former military leader of Krypton, General Zod, attacks Earth is search of Kal-El/Clark Kent and to ultimately destroy the human race it is up to Kent to assume the identity of Superman and save man kind.

In the past 10 or so years there have been a number of "reboots" in the superhero genre. For those playing along at home, a "reboot" is when a director, producer and/or studio decide that they would like to put their influence on a popular comic book character. Usually these are not one off movies, but turn into an entire series. Recently we have had Thor, Iron Man, Hulk (twice), Captain America (all leading to the Avengers), X-Men, Spider-Man (twice), Batman and now Superman for the second time. The thing that frustrates me most about reboots is that I feel that the first movie is often wasted. This is because whoever initiated the reboot insists on retelling the back story of the hero. As I already know things like how Spider-Man got his powers and why Batman decided to become a vigilante I feel like three-quarters of the movie is wasted. This is why most of the time I look forward to the sequel more because it focuses more on the villain (think the Dark Knight). Unfortunately Man of Steel does spend a significant amount of time on the back story. However, I do see the reasoning behind the studio's decision to do this as there would be a number of people who are not aware of the story of Superman. The ultimate goal of this film is to make money so diving straight into the deep end might turn viewers away.

The avid readers of this blog will be aware of my many movie theories, which include Rumer Willis Syndrome, the Deschanel Conundrum and the Vow Effect. Here I will discuss something I like to call the Christopher Nolan Influence. In the past most superhero movies are light hearted and always have a happy ending, think Tim Burton's Batman and the Christopher Reeve Superman series. Since the success of Nolan's The Dark Knight, superhero movies have become dark and twisted focusing more on emotion and exposing the weaknesses of our hero. The only recent superhero movie to buck this trend is the Avengers (thank you Joss Whedon). Man of Steel has fallen victim to the Christopher Nolan Influence. Granted he is a producer and writer of the film but the studio could have gone for someone different as a creative consultant. However, I really think his influence works for this film. If there is to be a Justice League Film, and I would give anything to see it come about, all the lead up films need to be of a similar style. Seeing Nolan's name on the credit gives me that glimmer of hope that there will be a Justice League film in the not to distant future.

An interesting thing to study in this film is the relationship between Zack Snyder (director) and Christopher Nolan (producer). Both are experienced film makers with their unique styles so I am curious to see how much Nolan will demand a seat in the director's chair or will he let Snyder do all the work. In the end it is obvious that Snyder was allowed to have a huge influence on the action scenes because they have his unique styling as seen in 300 and Suckerpunch. However, in the more dramatic scenes, such as the one where Superman is arrested, Nolan clearly takes the wheel. This relationship is similar to the one between Stephen Spielberg and Tobe Hooper in Poltergeist. Hooper (director), a master of gore horror after directing The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, was given the more crude, shocking scenes whilst Spielberg (producer) was given the more intricate, suspenseful scenes.

In the end, Man of Steel s a really really good movie. I mean really good. It is very well paced, has solid character development and has a great story. I was thoroughly entertained. My only gripe about the movie is that the end fight scene was a little too long. In an attempt to top the destruction bill seen in the Avengers, Man of Steel over stayed it's welcome by about 10 minutes.

Overall: One of the better films so far this year. 5 Stars

Tuesday, 25 June 2013

World War Z

World War Z (2013)

Predicted Rating: 4 Stars

Directed by: Marc Forster (Quantum of Solace). Starring: Brad Pitt (Inglorious Basterds), Mirielle Enos (Gangster Squad), and Matthew Fox (Lost).

A viral outbreak of unknown origin causes a world-wide zombie apocalypse. After escaping the initial mayhem, former United Nations employee Gerry Lane (Pitt) is rescued and sent to a U.S. Navy Ship off the coast of New York with his wife (Enos) and two daughters. Lane is enlisted by the government to investigate the source of the viral outbreak in an attempt to cure the virus and end the potential apocalypse. The search leads Lane on a whirlwind trip across the globe eventually ending up in a WHO research facility located in Cardiff, Wales before stumbling on an alternative measure to save the world.

As zombie movies are obviously a tried and tested genre and seem to be the flavour of the month for an extended period of time, World War Z must be different in some way in order to impress me. Unlike many zombie movies, World War Z takes a more militaristic approach. This means it is more of an action movie than say Night of the Living Dead or 28 Days Later. Unfortunately, my favourite zombie movies are the ones which focus more on character development rather that the action sequences. This way you can pick your favourite and least favourite characters, feel for them if they lose someone close to them and ultimately imagine how you would act in a similar situation. World War Z tends to rely on shaky camera effects, drawn out action sequences and abrupt changes in volume to build an atmosphere. In my opinion, this makes the movie appear impersonal and it fails to do what I value as the most important aspect of a post-apocalyptic movie; make the viewer believe they too are living this apocalypse. Apart from Gerry, the characters seem wooden, and excuse the extremely cliche analogy but it had to be done, are zombie like even when they are supposed to be alive.

In an attempt to be a more action packed zombie movie, World War Z often tries to do too much. The location changes way too much and whilst it is not hard to follow where Gerry is, he often seems lost. He is in Philadelphia, now New Jersey, now South Korea, now Israel and finally settling on Wales. Wait Wales? Why would you want to go there. Surely there are former WHO research facilities in more luxurious locations. Then to make things worse, everyone seeks refuge in Nova Scotia, Canada. You thought somewhere warmer would be more convenient. Apart from the rapid location changes, World War Z changes it's pace too much as well. It will be really fast paced in some places and then painstakingly slow on other occasions. This makes it extremely difficult to relax and enjoy the film because it often struggles to find it's identity.

As the novel this film is based on is written by the same guy who wrote The Zombie Survival Guide (Max Brooks), it is interesting to see some of his survival recommendations come into theoretical practice. The big one Brooks discusses and is flabbergasted that it is never used in zombie movies previously is push bikes as transportation. The reason why they are effective is that they never run out of fuel, they are silent and the repercussions of having an accident are far less significant than say with a motorcycle. World War Z features a very good scene involving push bikes and the importance of not making any noise. The film also looks at using an apartment complex as a good temporary stronghold and the importance of moving around. Very important tips to take into account if you believe a zombie apocalypse is imminent. We all know that it probably won't happen but if the world is to end in someway, a seriously infectious virus that re-animates the dead is definitely the way to do it.

Overall: A fairly solid and enjoyable action movie but lacks that certain something special in an overcrowded genre to really blow me away. 3.5 Stars.

Thumbs Up: Go and see this movie.